On-demand
Watch our webinar to learn more about data management for carbon emissions. The topics discussed are:
- The difference between Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions according to the GHG Protocol;
- The main challenges organisations face in carbon accounting;
- Tips and recommendations for efficient data management.
Below you can find some of the questions addressed during the Q&A:
- How are carbon accounting (GHG Protocol) aligned with CSRD reporting guidelines and laws?
- When explaining the estimation of the carbon footprint, you mention that one of the elements is activity data. What does that mean? Could you please give us an example? How to define an activity data?
- Is the hotspot of emissions data to focus on related to the materiality assessment?
- How connected or integrated is carbon accounting into the CSRD reporting requirements?
- If assumptions can be made on scope 3 emissions, is there a difference in the evaluation of data that are being shared in the report (for investment purposes by external parties)? Should I demand from my third-party partnerships that they provide me with accurate carbon emission data? (are there benefits compared to estimates?)
- What does EEIO mean?
- Are the benchmarks for the spend based approach per category and industry?
- What are the deadlines and the scope of companies that are required to do carbon reporting?
- Can we use LCA assessment to calculate the CO2 emission associated with all scopes?
- Do we need to include recycling of products in the carbon accounting in addition to the use phase?
